Traits must also be quasi-independent from other heritable traits, which suggests there must be additive genetic variance. The reasoning as to why cognitive modules must be heritable is that there cannot be selection for traits that are not heritable. Whereas, the term quasi-independent refers to a trait that is not dependent upon other factors for existence. Heritability is the capability of a trait being inherited. Lastly, the Learning-bias-canalization framework is discussed in depth.Īpplicable evolutionary cognitive psychology requires that specific cognitive abilities must be 1) heritable and 2) quasi-independent from other heritable traits. Next, criticisms of massive innate cognitive modules are presented to understand the Learning-bias-and canalization framework. Followed by the introduction to the two forms of heritable learning biases. To begin with, the dominant paradigm of evolutionary cognitive psychology containing massive innate cognitive modules is discussed. The proposed framework involves heritable learning biases in relationship to innate cognitive modules. This article composed by Denise Cummins, Robert Cummins and Pierre Poirier emphasizes a Learning-bias-and canalization framework (LBC) to provide insight to evolutionary cognitive psychology. Heritable Learning BiasesĬognitive evolutionary psychology without representational nativism in “the cat chased the mouse,” “chased” requires an object (“the mouse”) and a subject (“the cat”)). “the cat chased the mouse”) – and co-occurrence – the high chance that a word or phrase will follow the previous word or phase, based on grammatical rules (i.e. An example of this is the language of thought hypothesis this hypothesis reasons that the mind includes a logical, mental system that contains symbols, which are comprised of the definitions of words, word-order patterns – for example, in English, a subject often comes before a verb, which is followed by an object (i.e. One of Fodor’s main proposals for the mind included mental modules, a concept which states that the function of the brain is determined by its structure. Here, he argued for a calculated approach to perceptual systems, which he believed were automatic and quick. The Modularity of Mind may have been his most impactful work. Rather than agreeing with blank slate theory, Fordor believed that skills and abilities are present in the brain from birth, and that many of them would be impossible without genetic contribution prior to environmental experience. Jerry Fodor in 2009 (sourced from New York Times Obituaries).Īs a cognitive scientist, Jerry Fodor was a proponent of nativism – a concept opposite of blank slate theory. Since everyone’s experiences are unique, different opinions are inevitable. Icons made by Freepik from Locke’s work, while speaking to the concept of tabula rasa, also focused on empiricism – which is the antithesis of innateness, and is related closely to blank slate theory –, believing experience shapes ideas. (1) The brain is blank at birth, (2) then with experiences and environmental influence, (3) the brain develops. This leaves a lasting effect on who they become. įrom there, education, environment, and experiences – which are external, as well as material and/or immaterial – shape the child’s process of development. According to blank slate theory, the mind is completely blank at birth. Tabula Rasa: the mind in its hypothetical primary blank or empty state before receiving outside impressions something existing in its original pristine state (definition retrieved from on November 3, 2019).īased on the concept of tabula rasa, blank slate theory argues that we are born without any thoughts or opinions already developed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |